Grigoryan v. 108 Chambers St. Owner, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding town recreational ice rink open to public where any member of the public could enter rink and watch activities
• observing that spectators qualify as “recreational users” under Section 17C
• “the plaintiff introduced no evidence that the group actually paid for the use of the [hockey] rink” where plaintiff was injured
• “[T]he issue is whether the plaintiff paid a fee to the owner of the facility in exchange for her use of the premises ...”
• failure to remove ice from walkway to spectator stands held not wilful, wanton, or reckless
• statute applied because plaintiff “was no different from any other member of the public” who could enter ice rink and watch hockey game without paying fee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).