Griggs v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to the extent that the circumstantial evidence could be argued to “indicate[] a lack of the requisite criminal intent [to commit burglary], nothing more than a[n] . . . issue [for the fact finder] was created”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).