Griggs v. Alaska

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that company with 1% of market’s acquisition of another company with 22%-24% market share was a violation of § 7 of the Clayton Act and not de minimis where four companies dominated 50% of the market

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).