Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/1/2003
Griffith v. State
Citations
- 116 S.W.3d 782
- 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 512
- 2003 WL 22244671
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Section 12.42(c)(2) as it appeared at the time the instant offense was committed
- applying Section 12.42(c)(2) as it appeared at the time the instant offense was committed
- describing this enhancement provision as effecting a “two-strikes policy” for sex offenders
- the defendant's \argument would have more weight were it not for\ other language in the statute
- “If one reasonable interpretation yields absurd results while the other interpretation yields no such absurdities, the latter interpretation is preferred.”
- “If one reasonable interpretation yields absurd results while the other interpretation yields no such absurdities, the latter interpretation is preferred.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Price
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Leach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-16· cited 147×
- Prudholm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-03-16· cited 76×
- Beedy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-04-27· cited 44×
- Ex Parte ErvinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-04-06· cited 38×
- Ex Parte RoemerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-02-28· cited 25×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-03-27· cited 22×
- Rhodes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-07-27· cited 15×
- Prudholm v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-02-11· cited 13×
- Jones v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-05-10· cited 13×
- State v. Jose RuizCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-08-27· cited 13×
- Nixon v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-08-31· cited 11×
- State v. VerhoevenCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2004-11-04· cited 11×
- Lutz v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-01-19· cited 5×
- State v. Patrick Wayne VerhoevenTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2004-10-07· cited 1×
- Goodrich v. LivingstonFifth Circuit· 2008-10-07· cited 1×
- Terry Rhodes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-10-14
- Arnold Ray Beedy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-04-27
- Gabriel Lemell Prudholm v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2008-10-17
- Bruce William Lamar v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-12-18
- Duncan Farwell Leach v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-06-16
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.