Skip to main content

Griffith v. State

Citations

  • 116 S.W.3d 782
  • 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 512
  • 2003 WL 22244671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Section 12.42(c)(2) as it appeared at the time the instant offense was committed
  • applying Section 12.42(c)(2) as it appeared at the time the instant offense was committed
  • describing this enhancement provision as effecting a “two-strikes policy” for sex offenders
  • the defendant's \argument would have more weight were it not for\ other language in the statute
  • “If one reasonable interpretation yields absurd results while the other interpretation yields no such absurdities, the latter interpretation is preferred.”
  • “If one reasonable interpretation yields absurd results while the other interpretation yields no such absurdities, the latter interpretation is preferred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.