Skip to main content
· 6/28/1985

Griffith v. ITT World Communications, Inc.

Citations

  • 611 F. Supp. 1567
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court did not terminate its jurisdiction by using the words “Case closed” in disposition order
  • “[W]e hold that the district court did not terminate its jurisdiction by its use of the words ‘Case closed.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spellman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.