Griffith v. Hanks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding appeal filed by private developer of order requiring disclosure of documents under Right-to-Know Law
• providing that under one test, to establish that “commercial” or “financial” information is sufficiently “confidential” to justify nondisclosure, the party resisting disclosure must prove that disclosure “is likely: (1
• placing burden on the private developer opposing release by the New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority of documents sought by two newspapers pertaining to developer’s housing developments
• affirming trial court’s decision to order summary disclosure of documents inadequately described in Vaughn index, when party had repeatedly failed to comply with court’s order to produce an adequate index
• discussing RSA 91-A:5, IV exemption for “confidential, commercial, or financial information”
• explaining the purpose of a Vaughn index, a procedure often used in cases with a large number of documents potentially responsive to a Right-to-Know request, in which the government produces a general description of each document withheld and a justification for nondisclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).