Griffith v. Griffith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• In a contempt proceeding to coerce the payment of money, inability to pay is a complete defense against enforcing payment by imprisonment.
• In a contempt proceeding to coerce the payment of money, inability to pay is a complete defense against enforcing payment by imprisonment.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ivy v. Keith
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-12-12· cited 71×
• Sharum v. Dodson
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-07-17· cited 32×
• Aswell v. Aswell
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2004-10-13· cited 16×
• Balcom v. Crain
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2016-06-08· cited 16×
• Albarran v. Liberty Healthcare Management
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2013-12-11· cited 10×
• Stehle v. Zimmerebner
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2016-06-30· cited 8×
• Ingle v. Ingle
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2013-11-06· cited 5×
• Catt v. Catt
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2014-11-05· cited 4×
• Marston v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2015-03-11· cited 3×
• Rimmer v. Rimmer
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1959-01-26· cited 3×
• Butler v. Butler
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2014-10-01· cited 2×
• Volmer v. Volmer
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1987-03-27

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harmon v. Harmon
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1922-02-20· cited 22×
• Snook v. Snook
  Washington Supreme Court· 1920-03-19· cited 13×
• Ex parte Caple
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1907-01-14· cited 13×
• East v. East
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1921-04-04· cited 11×
• Hemby v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1934-01-15· cited 3×