Griffith v. Griffith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where one spouse had purchased realty prior to marriage, other spouse was only entitled to share in the amount of mortgage paid during marriage
• where one spouse had purchased realty prior to marriage, other spouse was only entitled to share in the amount of mortgage paid during marriage
• non-owner's spouse's contribution to the enhancement of a pre-owned asset, the marital home, could consist of mortgage pay-down during A-5362-17T4 30 the marriage and could convert an immune, pre-acquired asset into one whose appreciation is eligible for distribution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Marriage of Herr
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-02-13· cited 33×
• Valentino v. Valentino
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-03-30· cited 24×
• Anthony v. Anthony
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-07· cited 22×
• Estep v. Estep
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-10-01· cited 21×
• Coney v. Coney
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-07-24· cited 15×
• Scavone v. Scavone
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-11-09· cited 13×
• Rolle v. Rolle
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-05-15· cited 5×
• Rand v. Director
  New Jersey Tax Court· 1988-02-05· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Painter v. Painter
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1974-06-05· cited 215×
• Collins v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1968-10-15· cited 52×
• Scherzer v. Scherzer
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-10-10· cited 44×
• Mol v. Mol
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-01-28· cited 25×