Griffis v. Pinal County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]f a document falls within the scope of the public records statute, then the presumption favoring disclosure applies”
• balancing interests to determine if the state’s privacy or confidentiality concerns outweigh the presumption of disclosure
• remanding the case to permit the superior court to review the content of the disputed e-mails in camera to determine whether they were subject to the public records law
• tying definition of public record to production of the record as part of the public entity’s public duty
• providing “three alternative definitions of public records,” a term not defined by statute
• \Determining a document's status . . . requires a content-driven inquiry.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).