Griffis v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding when the plaintiff “rebutted the presumption he c[ould] perform the unskilled sedentary positions” through the opinion of a “certified vocational evaluation specialist,” and the ALJ did not challenge that expert’s qualifications or testing results

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).