Griffin v. STATE BANK OF COCHRAN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the elements of fraud include “a false representation hy a defendant, scienter, intention to induce the plaintiff to act or refrain from acting, justifiable reliance by plaintiff, and damage to plaintiff” (punctuation omitted)
• noting that the elements of fraud include “a false representation by a defendant, scienter, intention to induce the plaintiff to act or refrain from acting, justifiable reliance by plaintiff, and damage to plaintiff” (punctuation omitted)
• rejecting the defense of a breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing when, as here, the party asserting the claim failed to identify any provision in the contract that the other party failed to perform in good faith
• rejecting the defense of a breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing when, as here, the party asserting the claim failed to identify any provision in the contract that the other party failed to perform in good faith
• bank’s purported promise to renew a promissory note was too vague and indefinite to support promissory estoppel claim
• bank’s purported promise to renew a promissory note was too vague and indefinite 11 to support promissory estoppel claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).