Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/8/1963
Griffin v. State
Citations
- 194 A.2d 80
- 232 Md. 389
- 1963 Md. LEXIS 705
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- warrant authorizing police to search all persons on premises construed to allow police to search only those they witness committing a crime
- “We know of no practical method of executing [a warrant’s command to search] other than by arresting the person to be searched.”
- “As the search warrant itself must be founded upon probable cause, we do not think that conditional arrest for the purpose of executing the warrant is illegal or unreasonable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brune, Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, Horney, Marbury, Sybert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. PlatouSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-26· cited 113×
- Henson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-11-13· cited 86×
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-11-21· cited 78×
- State v. Intercontinental, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-01-09· cited 50×
- In Re a Special Investigation No. 228Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-04-07· cited 27×
- Cotton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-11· cited 23×
- Donaldson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-10-08· cited 21×
- Sutton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-09-29· cited 16×
- McGee v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-05-08· cited 7×
- State ex rel. L.Q.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-11-02· cited 6×
- Webster v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-02-19· cited 5×
- Eusebio v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-03-02· cited 5×
- State in Interest of LQNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-11-02· cited 1×
- (2001)Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2001-06-22
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 752×
- Patuxent Institution Board of Review v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-03-12· cited 38×
- Armwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-10-31· cited 31×
- Gattus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1954-05-27· cited 30×
- Dow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1955-04-18· cited 22×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1952-05-09· cited 18×
- United States v. QUANTITY OF EXTRACTS, BOTTLES, ETC.S.D. Florida· 1931-12-30· cited 16×
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1952-05-09· cited 14×
- Giordano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-10· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.