Griffin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a] petition for habeas corpus cannot substitute for a rule 3.850 motion, nor may it be used to, circumvent a rule 3.850 motion barred by the two-year limitations period or the proscription against successive motions”
• “Habeas corpus is ... the improper vehicle to address ... the performance of trial counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nelson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-04-29· cited 41×
• Gipson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-04· cited 1×
• Comesanas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-06

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mills v. Dugger
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-11-08· cited 34×
• Forget v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-09· cited 10×
• Griffin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-19· cited 2×
• Griffin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-05· cited 1×
• Nixon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-09· cited 1×
• Griffin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-12· cited 1×