Griffin v. Sheldon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a product’s labeling did not mislead consumers where there was “no extrinsic evidence that the perceptions of ordinary consumers align with [FDA] labeling standards”
• finding that a product’s labeling was not likely misleading to consumers under the GBL even though its labeling violated FDA standards
• finding that a product’s labeling was not likely misleading to consumers under the GBL even though its labeling violated FDA standards
• finding that plaintiffs failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of their GBL §§ 349-50 claim even though defendant’s label violated FDA standards
• distinguishing between violations of FDA and New York state labeling standards and actionable claims under GBL sections 349 and 350
• noting public interest would'be “well served by ensuring that consumers do not purchase a product based on false advertising”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).