Griffin v. Shandles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Plaintiffs could plead a claim for unjust enrichment in the alternative
• “Plaintiffs have alleged a public benefit even though this action seeks only money damages. Money damages may benefit consumers through providing compensation and a deterrent effect, and the plain language of the Private AG Statute allows for this type of recovery.”
• applying MCFA to non-Minnesota plaintiffs without discussing extra-territoriality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).