Griffin v. McKenney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding admission of expert testimony from a lay witness did not warrant reversal when error did not substantially prejudice the opposing party
• surgeon’s testimony was lay testimony to the extent it was “solely explanatory of [the doctor’s] treatment of [the patient] and of his records and nursing records about [the patient’s] care”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).