Griffin v. Brady

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendants’ argument that the state failed to meet the notice pleading standard because the Complaint did not identify specific contamination sites
• rejecting a distinction between private persons and state agencies or employees as gas consumers
• dismissing counts pled under the public trust doctrine and the USTFRA
• “The State’s allegation that waters in which it has an interest have been polluted by a possible human carcinogen due to Defendants[’] activities pleads a plausible injury in fact.” (citation omitted)
• “Insofar as the State used or consumed gasoline containing MTBE, it has the same right as a private party to be warned by sellers of their products’ reasonably foreseeable dangers.” (citation omitted)
• “The State’s allegations concerning MTBE’s behavior once in the ground — specifically its tendency to mix with water and its resistance to biodegradation — plausibly demonstrate that further injury from the chemical is certainly impending.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).