Griffin v. Arpaio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a grievance requesting a ladder to access the top bunk did not exhaust a claim that prison staff disregarded an order assigning the prisoner to a lower bunk
• concluding that 14 inmate grievance cannot serve to exhaust administrative remedies where it fails to “‘alert[ ] the 15 prison to the nature of the wrong for which redress is sought’”
• concluding that a prisoner’s 18 grievance cannot serve to exhaust administrative remedies where it fails to “‘alert[ ] the prison to 19 the nature of the wrong for which redress is sought’”
• concluding that a prisoner’s grievance cannot 19 serve to exhaust administrative remedies where it fails to “‘alert[ ] the prison to the nature of the 20 wrong for which redress is sought’”
• concluding that a prisoner’s grievance cannot 24 serve to exhaust administrative remedies where it fails to “‘alert[ ] the prison to the nature of the 25 wrong for which redress is sought’”
• holding that plaintiff’s grievance requesting a ladder to 14 access his top bunk did not exhaust his remedies with respect to a prison official’s subsequent 15 disregard of an order assigning him to a lower bunk

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).