Griffin Pipe Products Co. v. Guarino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding amendment “clarified rather than changed the existing law” in response to controversy “within the legal community concerning the correct application of the original statute”
• holding “agency properly concluded the two weeks during which [the claimant] had no earnings did not reflect the customary hours he typically worked”
• holding amendment “clarified rather than changed the existing law” in response to controversy “within the legal community concerning the correct application of the original statute”
• interpreting “would have been entitled” provision when employee did not work two of the thirteen weeks prior to his injury because employer’s plant was closed for two weeks for regular maintenance
• interpreting “would have been entitled” provision when employee did not work two of the thirteen weeks prior to his injury because employer’s plant was closed for two weeks for regular maintenance
• holding amendment “clarified rather than changed the existing law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).