Gribble v. Harry Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the conclusions of the trial judge are entitled to less deference” if voir dire is “cursory, rushed, and unduly limited”
• holding that it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to pose \compound\ voir dire questions to the venire as a whole, followed by extensive individual voir dire
• holding that it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to pose “compound” voir dire questions to the venire as a whole, followed by extensive individual voir dire
• concluding that a trial court has acted within its proper discretion when, “the voir dire process is viewed as a whole, it is clear that the trial court conducted extensive voir dire examinations of prospective jurors”
• “Without adequate voir dire, the trial judge is unable to fulfill his or her responsibility to eliminate those prospective jurors who will be unable to perform their duty impartially.”
• police officers engaged in procedural processing dictated by statute are not engaging in interrogation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).