Gribben v. Kirk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that abuse of discretion occurs when “the circuit court makes a clear error of judgment or exceeds the bounds of permissible choices in the circumstances”
• stating “[t]he issues presented ... involve questions of law; therefore, our review is plenary and de novo ”
• in order to avoid confusion we will refer to the prior case as Gribben I and to the two actions now before us as Gribben II
• “Under the abuse of discretion standard, we will not disturb a circuit court’s decision unless the circuit court makes a clear error of judgment or exceeds the bounds of permissible choices in the circumstances.”
• “appellate courts review questions involving principles of sovereign immunity de novo ”
• “Under the abuse of discretion standard, we will not disturb a circuit court’s decision unless the circuit court makes a clear error of judgment or exceeds the bounds of permissible choices in the circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).