Greywolf v. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the invasion of privacy principle cannot shield a person from [an] investigation[] by the police unless the investigation is carried out in an offensive manner”
• holding that \the invasion of privacy principle cannot shield a person from [an] investigation[ ] by the police unless the investigation is carried out in an offensive manner\
• holding “the orderly performance of the police officers’ duties” could not give rise to an invasion of privacy claim
• holding \the orderly performance of the police officers' duties\ could not give rise to an invasion of privacy claim
• stating that “[t]he following elements are required to maintain a cause of action for the tort of malicious prosecution” and include, but are not limited to, “ ‘a criminal proceeding instituted or continued by the defendant against the plaintiff ” (citations omitted)
• noting that factual questions should be resolved by a jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).