Greyhound Lines-West v. Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering litigation to proceed against the remaining solvent defendants despite bankruptcy filings by four co-defendants
• “The party seeking a stay must justify it by clear and convincing circumstances outweighing potential harm to the party against whom it is operative.”
• “The party seeking a stay must justify it by clear and convincing circumstances outweighing potential harm to the party against whom it is operative.”
• “[T]he plain wording of the statute . . . provides for an automatic stay of any judicial proceeding ‘against the debtor.’ . . . That insulation, however, belongs exclusively to the ‘debtor’ in bankruptcy.”
• discussing Landis, 299 U.S. at 254–55

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).