Skip to main content
· 9/1/1995

Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Rogers (In Re Eagle Bus Mfg., Inc.)

Citations

  • 62 F.3d 730
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24526
  • 27 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 982
  • 1995 WL 490576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to file proof of claim was due in part to confusion or ambiguity and supported finding of excusable neglect
  • stating that whether debtor had a reason to expect the claim was relevant to the prejudice inquiry
  • holding that a document duly served by mail creates a rebuttable presumption that it reached its destination in the usual time and actually was received by the person to whom the mail was addressed
  • holding that a document duly served by mail creates a rebuttable presumption that it reached its destination in the usual time and actually was received by the person to whom the mail was addressed
  • noting that, although it can create a fact issue, “[a] denial of receipt is insufficient to rebut a presumption that proper notice was given”
  • stating that whether debtor had a reason to expect the claim was relevant to the prejudice inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Higginbotham, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.