Grey v. First National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the employer followed its internal policies and procedures for the disciplinary proceedings against plaintiff and did not extort or attempt to financially ruin him, plaintiff did not allege extreme and outrageous conduct
• holding that where the employer followed its internal policies and procedures for the disciplinary proceedings against plaintiff and did not extort or attempt to financially ruin him, plaintiff did not allege extreme and outrageous conduct
• holding that where the employer followed its internal policies and procedures for the disciplinary proceedings against plaintiff and did not extort or attempt to financially ruin him, plaintiff did not allege extreme and outrageous conduct
• finding no actionable constructive discharge in a retaliatory discharge tort claim — not a claim under the public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine — and reasoning that the facts did not indicate employee was told to resign
• “ ‘[Constructive discharge is not an actionable concept’ in regard to retaliatory discharge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).