Grenon v. City of Palm Harbor Fire Dist.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The employment must, in some way, contribute an ‘increased risk’ of injury peculiar to 3 that employment; otherwise, the statutory requirement that the injury ‘arise out of employment’ would be eliminated.”
• “The employment must, in some way, contribute an ‘increased risk’ of injury peculiar to 3 that employment; otherwise, the statutory requirement that the injury ‘arise out of employment’ would be eliminated.”
• “The Florida Supreme Court has expressly declined to broaden the purpose of workers’ compensation legislation to allow recovery for all injuries occurring in the workplace, including those arising out of conditions personal to the claimant which are not caused or aggravated by industry.”
• “The Florida Supreme Court has expressly declined to broaden the purpose of workers’ compensation legislation to allow recovery for all injuries occurring in the workplace, including those arising out of conditions personal to the claimant which are not caused or aggravated by industry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).