Grenafege v. Department of Employment Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “the time-honored precept of ‘expressio unius est exclusio alterius,’ ” that is, the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another
• recognizing “time-honored precept of ‘expressio unius est exclusio alterius’ ” — the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another
• employing the precept of expressio unius est exclusio alterius to hold that “wages” meant those earned in subject employment where Legislature so indicated, but such restriction did not apply where Legislature did riot so indicate
• “If the legislative intent were as [appellant] contends, it would then be clearly expressed.”
• under maxim of expressio unius est exclusio alterius, “wages” meant those earned in subject employment where Legislature so indicated, but such restriction did not apply where Legislature did not so indicate
• the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).