Grenadier Realty Corp. v. RLI Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the jury’s award of excessive damages [was] proof that Plaintiff’s counsel’s misconduct probably influenced the jury”
• holding that the court must deny a motion for judgment as a matter of law “if there is substantial conflict in the evidence, such that reasonable and fair-minded persons in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach different conclusions.”
• holding that the court must deny a motion for judgment as a matter of law “if there is substantial conflict in the evidence, such that reasonable and fair-minded persons in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach different conclusions.”
• holding that the court must deny a motion for judgment as a matter of law “if there is substantial conflict in the evidence, such that reasonable and fair-minded persons in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach different conclusions.”
• holding that the court must deny a motion for judgment as a matter of law “if there is substantial conflict in the evidence, such that reasonable and fair-minded persons in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach different conclusions.”
• holding that the court must deny a motion for judgment as a matter of law “if there is substantial conflict in the evidence, such that reasonable and fair-minded persons in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach different conclusions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).