Greineder v. Massachusetts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding allegations that the defendant routed orders to maximize kickback revenue were barred by SLUSA
• affirming district court’s merits dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of SLUSA-precluded claims
• “Since SLUSA requires our attention to both the pleadings and the realities underlying the claims, plaintiffs cannot avoid SLUSA merely by consciously omitting references to securities or to the federal securities law.”
• \It is frivolous to suggest that negatively influencing the price and quantity at which clients may buy and sell securities would not 'make[] a significant difference to someone's decision to purchase or to sell a covered security.\ (alteration in original
• applying, without analysis, Rule 12(b)(6) standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).