Greif v. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting motion to dismiss on mootness grounds where plaintiff had not moved for certification twenty (20) months after the complaint was filed
• declining to apply mootness exception when plaintiff did not indicate that she was prevented from commencing discovery or moving for class certification after 20 months
• finding the action to be moot where the defendant served a Rule 68 offer of judgment and the plaintiff had not moved for class certification for twenty months
• declining to apply the exception where “nearly 20 months [had] elapsed” since the filing of the complaint and where the plaintiff had not indicated she was prevented from moving for certification
• “adopting] Judge Nickerson’s opinion [in Ambalu ] as being entirely dispositive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).