Gregory v. Lovlien

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “damages arising from legal malpractice claims are typically based on ‘purely economic loss’ ” (citations omitted)
• “In Groce, Geertz, and Johnson, the Oregon Supreme Court declined to adopt a broad prohibition on assignments but looked instead to the circumstances of the individual case.”
• “Rather than adhere to an absolute prohibition on assignments of personal injury claims, the [Geertz] court asked whether the public policy concerns that the rule against assignments was intended to prevent were present.”
• discussing historical connection between survivability and assignability
• providing a history of assignability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).