Gregory v. Haworth
Citations
- 25 Cal. 653
- 1864 Cal. LEXIS 83
Syllabus
<p>Fraudulent Assignor cannot Sue.—One who makes an assignment of property for the sole purpose of hindering, delaying, and defrauding his creditors, cannot maintain an action against the assignee to compel a re-assignment of it or a judgment for its value, if a re-assignment cannot be had, nor can a purchaser from the assignor, who buys with full knowledge of such fraudulent assignment, maintain such action.</p> <p>Same.—A party who comes into Court with a fraud upon, his lips cannot obtain relief.</p> <p>Allegations of Complaint and Judgment.—A recovery, if had, must he grounded upon the facts which are averred in the complaint, and not upon those which are denied.</p>
Judges: Sanderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-11-25· cited 153×
- Bender v. BenderOregon Supreme Court· 1887-01-10· cited 8×
- People ex rel. Lincoln County v. GeorgeIdaho Supreme Court· 1891-09-16· cited 4×
- Gutierrez v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court· 1883-12-28· cited 1×
- Bridger v. GoldsmithNew York Court of Common Pleas· 1893-05-01· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.