Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

Gregory v. Adams

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 262
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 192
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3186
  • 571 U.S. 907
  • 2013 WL 3489783
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 6771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that under the Eleventh Amendment state officials in their official capacities may be sued for equitable but not monetary relief
  • “[W]e are skeptical of those who seek equitable relief when they themselves have engaged in misconduct.”
  • “[T]he Ex Parte Young doctrine permits suits to proceed against state officers in their official capacities to compel them to comply with federal law.”
  • “it cannot be said that violations of plaintiffs’ rights to due process and equal protection automatically result in irreparable harm” (emphasis in original)
  • “[T]he inability to supply a full line of products may irreparably harm a merchant by shifting purchasers to other suppliers.”
  • “[W]hen the likelihood of success on the merits is great, a movant can show somewhat less in the way of irreparable harm and still garner preliminary injunctive relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.