Gregory Royal v. MB Landscape Solutions, Individually and Jointly Baldemar Arias, Individually and Jointly Unnamed MB Landscape Solutions' Employee-Tortfeasor (TBD) , Individually and Jointly Unnamed MB Landscape Solutions' Liability Insurer (TBD) , Individually and Jointly Bridge at Terracina, LLC, D/B/A Bridge at Terracina, Individually and Jointly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an officer’s subjective motivation is irrelevant to determining the applicability of the public safety exception to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966)
• holding that statements taken without proper warnings in exigent circumstances are admissible when taken to protect the public's safety
• recognizing that the presence of an empty holster on defendant’s person strongly indicated that he had recently possessed a gun
• holding that statements taken without proper warnings in exigent circumstances are admissible when taken to protect the public’s safety
• holding that statements taken without proper warnings in exigent circumstances are admissible when taken to protect the public's safety
• holding that statements taken without proper warnings in exigent circumstances are admissible when taken to protect the public's safety

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).