Gregory Michael Hawes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although the appellant did not renew his motion for judgment'of acquittal after presenting evidence, his claim that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction was still reviewable on appeal
• overlooking any ambiguity in the statement of the issues and looking to the substance of the argument
• accepting the state's \conce[ssion] that there can be no 'course of conduct' if there was no intent to harass\ in the first of two incidents
• insufficient evidence of “course of conduct” element of § 6-2-506

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).