Gregory Lee West v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “an entity cannot be held vicariously liable on a respondeat superior theory” under Title VI
• observing that a government’s “duty to enforce its laws may justify” injunctive relief
• finding it unnecessary to decide “whether the language of § 12601 imposes liability on the basis of general agency principles”
• finding it unnecessary to decide “whether the language of § 12601 imposes liability on the basis of general agency principles”
• explaining the Supreme Court has “interpreted Title IX consistently with Title VI” and that, under either statute, there can be no respondeat superior
• stating “Arizona statutes also empower counties to supervise and fund their respective sheriffs” (citing 5 SANCHEZ ET AL. V. MARICOPA COUNTY Opinion of the Court § 11-251(1))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).