Gregory Junkin v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 20 attorney violated MARPC 19-308(d) by failing to represent a client in an adequate manner
• reversing the hearing judge’s conclusion that the respondent did not violate MLRPC 1.5(a) in two client matters notwithstanding that Bar Counsel only took exception to that conclusion with respect to a third matter
• stressing the importance of diligent representation and adequate communication in immigration cases
• attorney violated Rule 8.4(d) by failing to represent a client in an adequate manner and failing to keep a client informed about the status of a case
• no liability under 5.3(c)(2) when attorney did not directly supervise staff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).