Gregory Esparza v. Ed Sheldon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the petitioner’s argument that his attorney could have “impeached [an adverse witness] more effectively by calling an expert” because “[t]his is precisely the sort of tactical judgment Strickland counsels against second-guessing” (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).