Gregory Carey v. John E. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party, including a pro se litigant, “bears the burden or keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address”
• holding that the district court did not abuse its 8 discretion in dismissing pro se plaintiff’s action for failure to keep the court apprised of his 9 correct address
• concluding that there was no less drastic sanction 2 available than dismissal where mail addressed to plaintiff was returned by the post 3 office as undeliverable and plaintiff did not provide updated address to court
• concluding that there was no less drastic sanction 9 available than dismissal where mail addressed to plaintiff was returned by the post 10 office as undeliverable and plaintiff did not provide updated address to court
• concluding that there was no 16 less drastic sanction available than dismissal where mail addressed to plaintiff was 17 returned by the post office as undeliverable and plaintiff did not provide updated 18 address to court
• concluding that there was no less drastic 16 sanction available than dismissal where mail addressed to plaintiff was returned by 17 the post office as undeliverable and plaintiff did not provide updated address to 18 court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).