Gregory A. Davis v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court incorrectly ruled that USSG § 1B1.13 was “applicable” to defendant-filed motion for compassionate release
• noting that district court has discretion to appoint counsel in proceedings under § 3582(c) if interests of justice so require
• noting that a district court abuses its discretion when it relies on erroneous factual or legal premises
• noting that reliance on an erroneous factual premise is an abuse of discretion in compassionate release proceedings
• affirming denial of compassionate release where “[t]he court’s rationale . . . was both rational and legitimate under [18 U.S.C. § 3553(a
• affirming district court order denying compassionate release where “[t]he court’s rationale . . . was both rational and legitimate under [18 U.S.C. § 3553(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).