Gregg County v. Farrar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Tort Claims Act notice requirement was an affirmative defense and therefore, should not have been raised in a plea to the jurisdiction
• holding that failure to comply with requirements of section 554.006(d) deprives trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction
• holding that failure to comply with requirements of section 554.006(d) deprives trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction
• holding that failure to comply with requirements of section 554.006(d) deprives trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction
• holding that failure to comply with the Whistleblower Act prerequisites deprives a trial court of jurisdiction
• rejecting “semantic argument” that “the employee manual 26 makes an appeal to the commissioner’s court optional by stating that the decision of the grievance committee may be appealed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).