Greg Taylor, Jr. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order requiring that broadcasters incorporate “video descriptions” into certain television programs fell outside the Commission’s ancillary authority even though it had been directed to produce a report on the subject
• finding that a statute authorizing a study on the use of video description does not authorize the Commission to adopt rules mandating video description
• rejecting as \entirely untenable\ the agency's position that the adoption of a regulation \is permissible because Congress did not expressly foreclose the possibility\
• rejecting as “entirely untenable” the agency’s position that the adoption of a regulation “is permissible because Congress did not expressly foreclose the possibility”
• distinguishing captioning from regulations that were “related to [a] program’s content” and noting that unlike creative works, “closed captioning is a straight translation of dialogue into text” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• distinguishing captioning from regulations that were “related to a program’s content” and noting that unlike creative works, “closed captioning is a straight translation of dialogue into text”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).