Skip to main content
· 11/13/2023

Greenwood v. A. Caserta Constr., L.L.C.

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 4097

Syllabus

APPELLATE REVIEW - App.R. 4(A) thirty-day rule untimely appeal motion for delayed appeals inapplicable to civil appeals.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in 3 habeas context, court of appeals reviews district court’s “factual finding[s]” as to 4 circumstances of original state court sentencing “for clear error”
  • “[T]he doctrine of equitable tolling does not permit . . . tolling whenever a petitioner must face the daunting procedural obstacles to obtaining habeas review without the assistance of counsel.”
  • “With respect to the second prong, a defendant’s statements that he would have accepted a plea offer in combination with some objective evidence, such as a significant sentencing disparity, is sufficient to support a prejudice finding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.