Greenwood Manor v. Iowa Department of Public Health, State Health Facilities Council

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioning nursing facilities had failed to demonstrate establishment of property interest in competitor facility's certificate of need application
• holding that nursing homes do not have a protected property interest in a competitor’s not receiving a certificate of need
• holding that petitioning nursing facilities had failed to demonstrate establishment of property interest in competitor facility's certificate of need application
• relying on former code provision and stating the court will not disturb “other agency action” unless the “agency committed an error of law or acted unreasonably, capriciously, or arbitrarily”
• stating courts are “guided by the maxim ‘expressio unius est exclusio alterius,’ i.e., the ‘expression of one thing is the exclusion of another,’” stating the exclusion of an item from a comprehensive statute is evidence of the legislature’s intent
• stating courts are “guided by the maxim ‘expressio unius est -exclusio alterius,’ i.e., the ‘expression of one thing is the exclusion of another,’ ” stating the exclusion of an item from a comprehensive statute is evidence of the legislature’s intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).