Skip to main content
· 10/15/1917

Greenwald v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad

Citations

  • 115 Miss. 598
  • 76 So. 557

Syllabus

<p>1. Evidence. Judicial notice. Marloet for blooded hunting dogs.</p> <p>The court officially knows that blue-blooded hunting dogs have a . market.</p> <p>2. Damage. Killing valuable dog on tracto. Instructions.</p> <p>In a suit for damages for the negligent killing of a blooded pointer dog, where the evidence showed that there was no local market for such dogs, the court should have instructed the jury to fix: the value of the dog at such sum as the evidence showed that a man who wanted to buy such a dog would be willing to pay for same; and to aid the jury in arriving at the value -of the dog, the court should permit the jury to consider the testimony as-to the values of such dogs in other places, wherein the owner might find a purchaser.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the opinion of experts cannot prevail over actual facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.