Greenville Shipbuilding Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Appellant clearly was in custody from the time he was placed under arrest. . ..\
• \A consent to search is not the type of incriminating statement toward which the [F]ifth [A]mendment is directed.\
• “[C]onsent to a search is not the type of incriminating statement toward which the fifth amendment is directed.”
• “[C]onsent to a search is not the type of incriminating statement toward which the fifth amendment is directed.”
• “A consent to a search is not the type of incriminating statement toward which the Fifth Amendment is directed.”
• statement taken in viola tion of Miranda may not be used to prove substantive facts at trial but may be used for other purposes if it satisfies legal standard of trustworthiness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).