Greenville Publishing Company, Inc. v. The Daily Reflector, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• involving allegations that “defendants 56 [had] deliberately set their advertising rates below cost and [had] made deceptive statements . . . to eliminate [a rival] from competition” (footnote omitted)
• “Because the combination rate offer is voluntary, we agree with the district court that it is not illegal per se as a tying arrangement”
• articulating and discussing the two tests
• articulating and discussing the two tests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).