Greenstein v. Meister

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether a matter constituted a proper grounds for continuance is within the discretion of the court
• noting that both the decedent’s wife and police detective testified to the decedents increasing pain until he lost consciousness, and an expert from London, relying on the testimony of others, was able to opine that the decedent’s pain exceeded the amount expected from surgery
• noting that both the decedent's wife and police detective testified to the decedents increasing pain until he lost consciousness, and an expert from London, relying on the testimony of others, was able to opine that the decedent's pain exceeded the amount expected from surgery
• continuance of only forty-eight hours upheld where new witness discovered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).