Greenmoss Builders, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that error in method by which interest from damages award was calculated was “an error in substantive law, not a clerical or mathematical error”
• holding that error in method by which interest from damages award was calculated was “an error in substantive law, not a clerical or mathematical error”
• considering whole statute, subject matter, and effects and consequences in its interpretation
• test for determining whether trial court properly found that Rule 60(b)(6) motion had been filed within reasonable time is whether trial court exercised sound discretion given all factors and circumstances of case
• several year delay from trial court decision not unreasonable where defendant pursued appeal to United States Supreme Court and filed motion within two months of entry of that judgment
• interpreting actuarial method as simple interest method

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).