Greenlon, Inc. of Cincinnati v. Greenlawn, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring transferor to give up some right to the business for transferee of trademark to assume transfer- or’s period of laches
• stating that while “no tangible assets must be transferred to the assignee to validate the assignment of a mark,” the assignment was invalid because the assignor did not transfer any part of his business when he effected the assignment and received a license back
• discussing cases where assignor continued use in order to establish converse proposition
• assignment invalid when assignor continued to operate own business using mark concurrently with geographically remote use by assignee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).